"The DSA Derailment"

Francesca Hong expected another DSA victory lap; Wisconsin voters slammed the brakes, reminding the socialist left that momentum can disappear faster than campaign night champagne.

I could see the confidence coming a mile away. The choreography was perfect: the triumphant smiles, the campaign-trail swagger, the expectation that another political domino was about to topple, and the warm glow of a room already behaving as though the victory had been written.

Francesca Hong danced toward that podium carrying something more powerful than a campaign speech: it’s called certainty.

The Democratic Socialists of America had every reason, at least inside its own echo chamber, to believe Wisconsin was next. Another win. Another headline. Another supposed milestone in the inevitable march of the Democratic Party toward the ideological left.

Then Wisconsin voters walked into their polling places and did something increasingly rare in American politics.

They interrupted the script.

What was supposed to be another celebratory victory lap for the party’s radical wing instead became something far more interesting: a Midwestern reality check.

David Crowley, the Milwaukee County executive who had briefly stepped away from the race before re-entering with the governor’s backing, pulled off a narrow but consequential upset. Hong, a former chef turned state assemblywoman, had offered voters a distinctly ideological vision. But Wisconsin voters apparently decided they weren’t shopping for a political revolution. They were looking for something that worked.

And that distinction matters.

Because politics can be incredibly seductive when you’re standing on a stage surrounded by people who already agree with you. You can convince yourself that the country is moving in your direction because everyone in the room is nodding.

Then comes Election Day.

That’s when theory meets reality.

Hong’s record and past positions, including controversial comments involving policing and traditional American holidays, gave Republicans plenty of ammunition. But the larger issue was bigger than one candidate or one primary.

It was whether Wisconsin voters wanted to become the next testing ground for a political ideology that has gained enormous traction in Democratic strongholds but remains considerably less popular when confronted with the practical concerns of ordinary voters.

Even some of the movement’s biggest stars seemed to recognize the political danger. Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stayed away from this particular contest, leaving Hong to carry the ideological banner herself.

And then the banner came crashing down.

She conceded.

Just like that, the supposed march forward hit a Midwestern speed bump.

I think the reason is fairly obvious.

You don’t have to live in Brooklyn, Madison, or inside the permanent political bubble of social media to understand that voters are watching what happens when ideology collides with reality.

Just look at my New York City.

I’ve watched DSA ideology turn political theory into governing policy while taxpayers, families, and businesses are left paying the price. How about the fact that more than 100 people are fleeing New York every single day, taking their income, businesses, and tax dollars with them. That means more than $1 million in taxable revenue is being lost every hour. And yet the political class keeps pretending this is somehow normal.

They can call it gentrification, capitalism, demographic change, or whatever fashionable excuse they want. I call it voting with your feet, and fleeing the consequences of Democratic Socialism.

People don’t care what you call it when they’re the ones packing the moving truck.

And that is the problem Democrats increasingly face nationally.

You can win applause by promising transformational government. You can generate enormous online enthusiasm by attacking moderates as insufficiently pure. You can raise money by declaring that capitalism itself is the problem.

But eventually someone asks the most inconvenient question in politics:

How much is this going to cost me?

That’s where slogans become math.

And math has a nasty habit of ruining political fantasies.

The Wisconsin result should therefore be viewed as something more consequential than one primary.

The Democratic Party’s ideological left has demonstrated that it can generate momentum. It has scored high-profile victories in Democratic strongholds. It has challenged establishment candidates, energized activists, and convinced many Democrats that the future belongs to a more confrontational, more ideological movement.

But there is an enormous difference between winning a primary in a deeply blue district and persuading the voters who actually determine control of Congress, governorships, and presidential elections.

Those voters are not necessarily interested in ideological purity.

They’re interested in whether they can afford their mortgage.

Whether their kids are safe.

Whether their taxes are going up.

Whether their neighborhood is functioning.

Whether their schools work.

Whether government can actually deliver something without turning every issue into a political crusade.

That is the battlefield we are heading into come November.

Crowley now moves toward a general-election showdown with Republican Congressman Tom Tiffany, backed by Donald Trump. Crowley will emphasize jobs, schools, affordability, and economic realities. Tiffany will campaign on lower taxes, farmers, healthcare, and a more conservative governing philosophy.

And notice what voters are being asked to decide.

Not which candidate can deliver the most spectacular ideological performance.

Which candidate can convince them that their lives will be better.

That distinction is going to matter enormously.

We’re seeing political currents shift all over the country. From Wisconsin to South Carolina and beyond, voters are confronting open questions about what their parties actually represent and where they want their states and country to go.

I will continue to scream this from the rooftop, despite so many who hate when I do it. The midterms won’t be decided by cable-news applause meters.

They won’t be decided by the loudest activists on social media.

And they certainly won’t be decided by whichever political faction has the most enthusiastic audience inside its own bubble; like here on Substack.

They’ll be decided by voters sitting at kitchen tables doing the arithmetic of everyday life.

That’s why I think Wisconsin matters.

Political movements can manufacture excitement. They can create viral moments. They can fill rooms, dominate social media, generate fundraising emails, and convince themselves that history is moving inexorably in their direction.

But eventually the music stops.

The lights come on.

The campaign signs come down.

And voters get handed the bill.

That’s when ideology has to answer to reality.

Francesca Hong may have arrived expecting another democratic domino to fall.

Instead, Wisconsin voters reached for the political emergency brake.

And sometimes, one state has to yank the microphone away, kill the spotlight, and remind the ideological circus that America isn’t their echo chamber; it’s the audience, and it just booed.

____________________________________________________________________________

Received this from a fan:

Since Cohen joined WABC: WABC 3.5 → 4.1 in the July Nielsen book.

The Apple Podcasts page for “When You Know You Know” currently displays 4.7/5 from about 1,920 ratings.

Nielsen’s July 2026 New York PPM results were released on August 10, and 77 WABC rose from a 3.5 share in June to a 4.1 share in July among persons 6+, Monday–Sunday, 6 a.m.–midnight. That is about a 17% month-over-month increase in audience share.

____________________________________________________________________________

MORE THAN 625,000 PEOPLE READ MY ARTICLES THIS WEEK ALONE.

SO, WHERE ARE YOU? I’LL ASK AGAIN…WHERE ARE YOU?

I AM ASKING EACH OF YOU TO RESTACK, LIKE AND SHARE.

IT’S REALLY THAT EASY.

HELP US TO REBUILD AND GROW OUR COMMUNITY!

Yeah, I know; you’re tired. This shit is exhausting.

Guess what? Me too.

But I’ve spent the last 8 years throwing punches in the dark so truth could get a little daylight. And now I’m asking you to step into the ring with me.

Because if you’re still reading this, you already get it:

This isn’t just a newsletter. It’s a rally cry. A war drum. A line in the sand.

We are not passive observers of the downfall. We are the resistance. We call out the liars. We drag corruption by the collar into the sunlight. We say the quiet parts out loud; and we don’t flinch.

But here’s the truth: I can’t do this solo. Not anymore.

The storm is already here. We are standing in it. And it’s wearing stars and stripes like camouflage, preaching “freedom” while it sells fascism at retail.

So let me ask you:

Are. You. In?

Because this is not a scroll-and-forget read. This is a living, breathing, fire-breathing movement; and movements don’t move unless you do.

We need to be louder than spin, tougher than propaganda, and impossible to gaslight.

That takes more than clicks. More than likes.

It takes skin in the game.

So if you believe truth matters; if you’re sick of the bullshit, if you’re ready to stop screaming into the algorithm and start pushing back with purpose, this is your next step.

HERE’S HOW YOU PUT YOUR FOOT ON THE GAS:

Become a paid subscriber. Fund fearless, unfiltered journalism that hits back.

Share this with the loudest people you know; the ones who never sit down and shut up.

Build the community. Amplify the message. Be the damn megaphone.

And yeah; Founding Members? The first 240 of you will get a signed, numbered, limited-edition Substack version of Revenge. That’s not just a collector’s item. That’s receipts. Proof you didn’t sit this one out.

But let’s be clear:

This isn’t about a book.

It’s about backbone.

It’s about calling out the gaslighters and refusing to be played.

It’s about locking arms and saying, “Not. On. Our. Watch.”

You want to make a difference?

Then make it; right now.

Because if we don’t fight for truth, no one will.

But if we fight together?

They can’t drown us out.

Let’s be so loud, they wish we were just angry tweets.

Let’s be unshakable.

Unignorable.

Un-fucking-breakable.

Let’s go!