Discussion about this post

User's avatar
M. Shama's avatar

Michael for the Iast few years I was a faithful follower and believer of you in so many ways. I defended the fact to many of my friends and family that I truly believed you redeemed yourself away from the likes of Trump and the horrible things you did in service of him all those years. I believed you when you said you were part of a cult working for Trump and were swept up and brainwashed by the temptations of money and power but during your time in prison you saw the light and became a changed man. But your Substack a few days ago has changed things for me. It is just not making sense or registering with me logically. You say you were "coerced" by the prosecutors to go along with your testimony? Why did you go along with their coercion? The last two years you stated countless times how proud you were to stand up against your ex-boss's corrupt ways. You in fact wore it as your badge of honor. Now all of a sudden your story changes? How were you coerced? What exactly did you say that wasn't truthful? Most importantly, I have questions about your timing. Why is this coming out now after 1-2 years after your testimony? Why are you giving this ammunition to Trump to go after the left? He now has proof thanks to you that they were always after him by any means. He will use your statements to bolster his attempt to get both of his cases dismissed and continue going after the "lunatic liberal" prosecutors. Everyone should be asking themselves about the timing ...why did you wait to come out with that Substack article now just when Trump wants to appeal both of his cases?? I have many questions and your recent articles have answered none of them.

Barking Justice Media's avatar

Michael—

Your article from yesterday is still with me. The asymmetry you described, between how quickly destruction happens and how slowly restoration unfolds, that's the structural problem underneath everything else.

The bureaucratic grinder doesn't distinguish between guilt and innocence. It operates through time and process, and defense always carries costs that accusation never does.

We've built a system where outrage scales infinitely and evidence doesn't. Outrage is faster, easier, and more profitable than the slow work of critical thinking. It doesn't require us to learn anything new or sit with complexity. That's what makes it so powerful, and so destructive.

We can name it clearly. Let's break out of this cycle.

Mika—

153 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?