"THE EXTRACTION THEY SHOULDN’T KNOW"

A shocking security revelation may have just handed America’s enemies a blueprint for targeting the president—and every president who follows him into office.

Let’s begin today with a dose of reality so disturbing, I have to ask a question before anything else:

How the hell did this become a story that was allowed to be told in the first place?

Because this isn’t merely a story about Donald Trump.

It’s a story about how the United States protects its president from assassination, and whether we have become so addicted to immediate information that we are willing to expose the very methods designed to keep the president alive.

According to the account emerging from Ankara, Turkey, intelligence indicated a credible, high-level assassination threat against President Trump originating from Iran. What followed sounds like something ripped from a Cold War thriller.

Trump publicly boarded Air Force One, turned toward the cameras, and waved.

But that wasn’t the whole story.

Once inside, he was reportedly moved through a concealed exit, transferred using an airport catering vehicle, transported across the tarmac to a modified Boeing 757, and flown out under the call sign RCH18.

And then came the truly extraordinary part.

The traditional Air Force One continued operating under its official designation.

AF1.

A decoy.

The president was somewhere else.

Stop and think about that for a moment.

The aircraft that the world believed was carrying the president was deliberately separated from the aircraft actually carrying him. And aboard that decoy aircraft?

Journalists. White House personnel. Flight crew. Civilians.

People who, according to the account, were kept in the dark while their aircraft potentially became the most obvious target in the sky.

That is not a movie.

That is not political theater.

That is a presidential security operation.

And the fact that the details are now public should make every American pause.

Because now we know something our adversaries did not necessarily know before.

We know the method.

We know that when intelligence identifies a serious threat, the president may be quietly extracted from Air Force One.

We know an ordinary-looking airport vehicle can potentially become part of that extraction.

We know another aircraft can potentially be substituted.

We know the presidential aircraft can continue moving as a decoy.

We know an alternative call sign can be used.

We know the press pool can remain aboard the decoy aircraft.

And now, potentially, our enemies know it too.

That is the part of this story that bothers me, and should bother you, far more than whether a reporter was given a briefing.

Because intelligence isn’t simply about knowing what happened.

Intelligence is about learning how your adversary thinks.

Every operational detail revealed publicly gives someone on the other side another piece of the puzzle.

You don’t need the entire playbook.

You just need enough pieces to begin reconstructing it.

Imagine you’re an adversary trying to assassinate an American president.

You learn that the president may be removed from his aircraft after appearing publicly to board it.

You learn that a second aircraft may be involved.

You learn that the aircraft publicly associated with the president can potentially serve as a decoy.

You learn that movement across an airport can be concealed through ordinary logistics.

What do you do with that information?

You don’t necessarily focus exclusively on the aircraft.

You start watching everything around it.

The runway.

The hangars.

The alternate aircraft.

The motorcade.

The airport vehicles.

The catering trucks.

The cargo.

The security perimeter.

The personnel moving around the aircraft.

Everything.

And that is where this becomes genuinely frightening.

Because if an enemy knows the president might be moved through the very machinery of an airport, then the machinery itself becomes a potential target.

The catering truck that everyone ignores.

The cargo vehicle nobody notices.

The secondary aircraft nobody suspects.

The seemingly routine movement across the tarmac.

Suddenly, the ordinary becomes extraordinary.

And the more we explain publicly about how the United States moves its president during a crisis, the more we potentially teach our adversaries where to look.

That’s the danger.

Which brings me to the media.

I understand the First Amendment.

I spent years defending it and even had mine violated.

I understand that journalists have a responsibility to question government officials, challenge official narratives and demand accountability.

But there is a profound difference between the public’s right to know and the public’s right to know immediately while an assassination threat is actively unfolding.

Those are not the same thing.

A reporter’s deadline is not more important than a president’s life.

A television producer’s desire for a live shot is not more important than national security.

A journalist’s demand to know which aircraft the president is actually aboard is not more important than ensuring an enemy cannot determine where that aircraft is headed.

And transparency does not mean handing an adversary a tactical map.

There are moments when secrecy isn’t corruption.

Secrecy is protection.

There are moments when withholding information isn’t an attack on the press.

It is the job of the people responsible for keeping someone alive.

That’s why I find the outrage over being kept uninformed so difficult to understand.

The press corps reportedly became furious because they weren’t told what was happening in real time.

But consider the alternative.

What if someone had publicly reported:

“The president isn’t actually aboard Air Force One.”

What if someone identified the aircraft carrying him?

What if someone revealed the route?

What if someone described the movement across the tarmac?

What if someone identified the vehicle?

What if an enemy intelligence service was watching that broadcast?

That isn’t journalism operating in a vacuum.

That is information moving through a global communications network during an active security threat.

And once information leaves the building, you don’t get to decide who receives it.

That’s the uncomfortable reality.

Which brings me to the question I think deserves far more attention:

Who decided that these details should become public?

Who decided the American people needed to know the mechanics of a presidential extraction?

Who decided it was acceptable to disclose that the president could be moved from one aircraft to another?

Who decided that revealing the existence of a decoy strategy was worth whatever security consequences might follow?

And most importantly:

Did anyone think about the next president?

Because Donald Trump won’t be president forever.

Republicans won’t occupy the White House forever.

Democrats won’t occupy the White House forever.

Eventually, another person will sit behind that Resolute Desk.

Maybe someone you love.

Maybe someone you despise.

Maybe someone who represents everything you believe in.

Maybe someone who represents everything you oppose.

It doesn’t matter.

The presidency belongs to the American people.

And if we expose the methods used to protect one president, we potentially expose the next president as well.

This isn’t a Trump issue.

It’s an American issue.

Today the president happens to be Donald Trump.

Tomorrow it will be someone else.

And if our enemies learn that the American president can be extracted through a particular sequence of actions, they don’t forget that information when the administration changes.

They archive it.

They study it.

They build intelligence around it.

They wait.

That is how adversaries operate.

They don’t need to win every day.

They need to discover one vulnerability and exploit it at the right moment.

And that is why I believe we need to rethink what we consider newsworthy.

Not everything that can be reported should be reported immediately.

Not every secret is a scandal.

Not every withheld detail is evidence of government deception.

Sometimes the people who know the most are the people who are saying the least because they understand the consequences of saying too much.

The press doesn’t have to like that.

They don’t have to trust the administration.

They don’t have to stop investigating.

But there should be one line every responsible journalist understands:

When the president is under an active assassination threat, protecting the president comes before protecting the deadline.

Because the next time an enemy watches an American president board Air Force One, I don’t want that enemy thinking:

“Now we know what they do.”

I want them thinking:

“We have absolutely no idea where he is.”

That’s what secrecy is supposed to accomplish.

That’s what national security is supposed to protect.

And that’s why this story may be far more consequential than the people who reported it seem to understand.

Because sometimes the most dangerous thing you can publish isn’t a lie.

It isn’t propaganda.

It isn’t misinformation.

It’s the truth your enemy never needed to know.

____________________________________________________________________________

Received this from a fan:

Since Cohen joined WABC: WABC 3.5 → 4.1 in the July Nielsen book.

The Apple Podcasts page for “When You Know You Know” currently displays 4.7/5 from about 1,920 ratings.

Nielsen’s July 2026 New York PPM results were released on August 10, and 77 WABC rose from a 3.5 share in June to a 4.1 share in July among persons 6+, Monday–Sunday, 6 a.m.–midnight. That is about a 17% month-over-month increase in audience share.

____________________________________________________________________________

MORE THAN 625,000 PEOPLE READ MY ARTICLES THIS WEEK ALONE.

SO, WHERE ARE YOU? I’LL ASK AGAIN…WHERE ARE YOU?

I AM ASKING EACH OF YOU TO RESTACK, LIKE AND SHARE.

IT’S REALLY THAT EASY.

HELP US TO REBUILD AND GROW OUR COMMUNITY!

Yeah, I know; you’re tired. This shit is exhausting.

Guess what? Me too.

But I’ve spent the last 8 years throwing punches in the dark so truth could get a little daylight. And now I’m asking you to step into the ring with me.

Because if you’re still reading this, you already get it:

This isn’t just a newsletter. It’s a rally cry. A war drum. A line in the sand.

We are not passive observers of the downfall. We are the resistance. We call out the liars. We drag corruption by the collar into the sunlight. We say the quiet parts out loud; and we don’t flinch.

But here’s the truth: I can’t do this solo. Not anymore.

The storm is already here. We are standing in it. And it’s wearing stars and stripes like camouflage, preaching “freedom” while it sells fascism at retail.

So let me ask you:

Are. You. In?

Because this is not a scroll-and-forget read. This is a living, breathing, fire-breathing movement; and movements don’t move unless you do.

We need to be louder than spin, tougher than propaganda, and impossible to gaslight.

That takes more than clicks. More than likes.

It takes skin in the game.

So if you believe truth matters; if you’re sick of the bullshit, if you’re ready to stop screaming into the algorithm and start pushing back with purpose, this is your next step.

HERE’S HOW YOU PUT YOUR FOOT ON THE GAS:

Become a paid subscriber. Fund fearless, unfiltered journalism that hits back.

Share this with the loudest people you know; the ones who never sit down and shut up.

Build the community. Amplify the message. Be the damn megaphone.

And yeah; Founding Members? The first 240 of you will get a signed, numbered, limited-edition Substack version of Revenge. That’s not just a collector’s item. That’s receipts. Proof you didn’t sit this one out.

But let’s be clear:

This isn’t about a book.

It’s about backbone.

It’s about calling out the gaslighters and refusing to be played.

It’s about locking arms and saying, “Not. On. Our. Watch.”

You want to make a difference?

Then make it; right now.

Because if we don’t fight for truth, no one will.

But if we fight together?

They can’t drown us out.

Let’s be so loud, they wish we were just angry tweets.

Let’s be unshakable.

Unignorable.

Un-fucking-breakable.

Let’s go!