"When Presidents Hunt"

America is no longer merely witnessing an aggressive presidency; it is watching the rise of a government where perceived enemies can be hunted, targeted, and destroyed anywhere.

There was a time when American presidents, regardless of party, at least attempted to preserve the appearance of restraint. They understood that immense military and legal power required caution, deliberation, and accountability. The office carried enough authority on its own; it did not need to become personal.

Today, under Donald Trump’s second presidency, that line appears to be fading. Increasingly, the presidency is being redefined not simply as the executor of law, but as the ultimate arbiter of who constitutes a threat to the United States; both at home and abroad.

And that shift should concern every American.

The Trump administration’s recent actions and rhetoric suggest a worldview where national security authority is no longer confined by geography, diplomacy, or even traditional legal boundaries. The administration has embraced an aggressive doctrine that frames enemies; foreign leaders, terror networks, cartel figures, and even certain domestic activist groups, under the same expansive umbrella of “counterterrorism.”

That framework grants enormous flexibility to any administration willing to use it.

Consider the examples unfolding simultaneously. The aggressive pursuit and arrest efforts surrounding Nicolas Maduro. The targeted killing of senior ISIS leadership in Nigeria; as well as Iranian leadership figures such as Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. And now, perhaps most symbolically, the reported effort by Trump’s DOJ to seek an indictment against 94 year old Cuban leader Raul Castro connected to the 1996 Brothers to the Rescue incident.

Individually, each case can be debated on its merits. Maduro has long been accused of corruption and narcotics trafficking. ISIS leadership represents legitimate terrorist threats. Castro’s regime has decades of documented human rights abuses attached to it.

But together, these actions reveal something larger: the emergence of an American presidency increasingly comfortable projecting legal and military power across virtually any border if the administration determines an individual poses a threat.

That evolution becomes even clearer in the administration’s newly revealed counterterrorism strategy.

As reported by The Intercept, the document contains the striking line: “We will find you, and we will kill you.”

It is unusually blunt language for an official U.S. doctrine. More importantly, the strategy reportedly broadens the categories of who may fall under counterterrorism scrutiny; extending beyond traditional terrorist organizations into anti-fascist activists, so-called narco-terrorists, and other non-state actors the administration views as destabilizing.

Critics argue this creates an extraordinarily elastic definition of terrorism, one capable of expanding depending on political priorities.

And that is where the concern deepens.

Because once an administration begins framing a widening range of adversaries through the lens of counterterrorism, extraordinary powers that were originally justified for wartime use become normalized in entirely different contexts. The legal thresholds become murkier. Oversight weakens. Public debate narrows because opposition can be portrayed as weakness on national security.

Nick Turse, one of the reporters examining the strategy, described it as the continuation of a long trend of executive overreach that spans multiple administrations. He is correct about one important point: this did not begin with Donald Trump.

For nearly twenty-five years, presidents from both parties have steadily expanded the authority of the executive branch under the justification of post-9/11 security. Drone warfare, targeted killings, covert operations, and classified legal authorities became routine components of American foreign policy from Afghanistan to Yemen to Somalia.

What makes the current moment different is not necessarily the existence of these powers, but the openness with which they are being discussed and potentially broadened.

The administration appears increasingly willing to use counterterrorism doctrine not simply as a military tool abroad, but as a governing philosophy.

And that carries risks.

Because democracies rely on distinctions: distinctions between war and law enforcement, between dissent and extremism, between national security and political opposition. When those lines blur, even for understandable reasons, the long-term consequences can be profound.

Supporters of the administration argue these measures demonstrate strength at a time of growing global instability. They point to cartel violence, international terrorism, cyberwarfare, and hostile foreign actors as evidence that traditional approaches are no longer sufficient.

Critics counter that concentrating such expansive authority inside the executive branch creates dangerous precedent; especially when definitions of “threat” become increasingly broad and subjective.

Both arguments deserve serious discussion.

But what cannot be ignored is the larger transformation underway. The presidency is evolving into something far more unilateral and far more global in scope than Americans may fully appreciate. Congress appears increasingly sidelined. International norms are treated as optional. Legal justifications often remain classified. And the American public is left to trust that these powers will always be used wisely and narrowly.

History suggests caution.

Governments rarely surrender expanded authority once acquired. Emergency powers, once normalized, tend to persist long after the original emergency has passed. And every administration inherits the tools created by the one before it.

That is why this moment matters far beyond Donald Trump himself.

The real question is not whether one agrees or disagrees with targeting Maduro, Castro, Khamenei, ISIS operatives, or hostile foreign actors. The real question is whether Americans are comfortable with a presidency that increasingly defines, pursues, and punishes perceived enemies with fewer visible constraints than ever before.

Because once the office assumes the combined role of judge, jury, and global executioner, the balance envisioned by the Constitution begins to shift in ways that may prove difficult to reverse.

____________________________________________________________________________

DO YOU ENJOY MY Substack POSTS AND LIVES?

I’M LOOKING FOR 20 NEW “PAID” SUBSCRIBERS FOR THE DAY.

HELP US TO REBUILD AND GROW OUR COMMUNITY!

SUBSCRIBE. READ. LIKE. RESTACK.

Yeah, I know; you’re tired. This shit is exhausting.

Guess what? Me too.

But I’ve spent the last 8 years throwing punches in the dark so truth could get a little daylight. And now I’m asking you to step into the ring with me.

Because if you’re still reading this, you already get it:

This isn’t just a newsletter. It’s a rally cry. A war drum. A line in the sand.

We are not passive observers of the downfall. We are the resistance. We call out the liars. We drag corruption by the collar into the sunlight. We say the quiet parts out loud; and we don’t flinch.

But here’s the truth: I can’t do this solo. Not anymore.

The storm is already here. We are standing in it. And it’s wearing stars and stripes like camouflage, preaching “freedom” while it sells fascism at retail.

So let me ask you:

Are. You. In?

Because this is not a scroll-and-forget read. This is a living, breathing, fire-breathing movement; and movements don’t move unless you do.

We need to be louder than spin, tougher than propaganda, and impossible to gaslight.

That takes more than clicks. More than likes.

It takes skin in the game.

So if you believe truth matters; if you’re sick of the bullshit, if you’re ready to stop screaming into the algorithm and start pushing back with purpose, this is your next step.

HERE’S HOW YOU PUT YOUR FOOT ON THE GAS:

Become a paid subscriber. Fund fearless, unfiltered journalism that hits back.

Share this with the loudest people you know; the ones who never sit down and shut up.

Build the community. Amplify the message. Be the damn megaphone.

And yeah; Founding Members? The first 240 of you will get a signed, numbered, limited-edition Substack version of Revenge. That’s not just a collector’s item. That’s receipts. Proof you didn’t sit this one out.

But let’s be clear:

This isn’t about a book.

It’s about backbone.

It’s about calling out the gaslighters and refusing to be played.

It’s about locking arms and saying, “Not. On. Our. Watch.”

You want to make a difference?

Then make it; right now.

Because if we don’t fight for truth, no one will.

But if we fight together?

They can’t drown us out.

Let’s be so loud, they wish we were just angry tweets.

Let’s be unshakable.

Unignorable.

Un-fucking-breakable.

Let’s go!